Re:Show HN: RankedVote – SurveyMonkey but focused on ranked-...
by gamegoblin on Thursday October 06, 2022 @04:37PM
(#33113771)
> If you think fringe groups should have the advantage I'd like to hear your argument.
I'm not sure what gave you the impression I think that. My comments clearly suggest that my view is that STAR > Approval-to-runoff > Approval > RCV-IRV > Plurality. My reasoning is that I place a very high value on the condorcet and favorite betrayal criteria.
Re:Show HN: RankedVote – SurveyMonkey but focused on ranked-...
by godelski on Thursday October 06, 2022 @06:19PM
(#33114857)
My apologies then. It was the italicized "undue" that made me think that this was your position. I read it as "undeserving".
As for the condorcet winner, that is quite hard actually. But if we consider a weak condorcet winner (where it is true 90+% of the time), that isn't as hard. I do think simplicity, transparency, and reduced vulnerability to strategy is a worthwhile trade-off for a strong condorcet winner. But of course, this is just my personal opinion and what's the preferred optima depends a lot on personal preferences.
If by "moderates" you mean "most liked" then I'm not sure what the problem is here. The point of voting is to find the most universally agreed upon ruler. You may call this unfair, but I would say that it is MORE unfair to give advantage to fringe groups rather than giving advantage to the masses. I thought the point of democracies was about having rule by the masses. If you think fringe groups should have the advantage I'd like to hear your argument.