Re:Cloud desktops aren't as good as you'd think
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Thursday October 06, 2022 @09:40AM
(#33108022)
> In one particular industry that is rife with cloud desktops you can be trusted to invest or trade $X mln dollars of someone else’s money on a daily basis, or to model out a $Y billion dollar M&A deal, but God forbid you try to install VSCode or MobaXTerm on your own.
I feel this so much.
Re:Cloud desktops aren't as good as you'd think
by guhidalg on Thursday October 06, 2022 @10:30AM
(#33108636)
I don't understand when and why so much power was delegated to IT w.r.t installing software. The FSF needs to start fighting IT and device management policies before talking about open source software.
Re:Cloud desktops aren't as good as you'd think
by origin_path on Thursday October 06, 2022 @02:04PM
(#33111702)
It's because people install malware a lot. Usually it comes along for the ride with pirated software, creating a 2x headache. I remember when they introduced similar policies at Google for Windows workstations - the stated rationale was that Windows users would warez literally anything and this was independent of job role or position. Senior engineering managers would be warezing things and it would come bound to malware. So they moved to binary whitelisting, eventually :(
Linux avoids this problem mostly because it doesn't have much commercial software to pirate in the first place.
In one particular industry that is rife with cloud desktops you can be trusted to invest or trade $X mln dollars of someone else’s money on a daily basis, or to model out a $Y billion dollar M&A deal, but God forbid you try to install VSCode or MobaXTerm on your own.
IT presumably got tired of being bombarded with application install requests, so one solution is to use vendorized cloud desktops that come with pretty easy tools (for them) to install applications.