News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RFC: C++ Buffer Hardening by rwmj on Thursday October 06, 2022 @05:32AM (#33106291)
The first one also sounds a bit like -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in glibc which fortifies memcpy etc. Many Linux distros have had this enabled by default for years. (https://stackoverflow.com/a/16604146)

Agree the second one both sounds interesting and also quite disruptive to existing code.

Re:RFC: C++ Buffer Hardening by fweimer on Thursday October 06, 2022 @07:25AM (#33106888)
_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is slightly different because it uses the bounds information that is already available. The historical expectation is that operator[] doesn't perform bounds checking by default, you need to use the at(size_type) members for that. Hence _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS for opting in. It's basically a library-only thing, much easier to implement than source fortification.