News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on RFC: C++ Buffer Hardening. Parent comment

Re:RFC: C++ Buffer Hardening by olliej on Thursday October 06, 2022 @04:05AM (#33105726)
> And some that is defined deserves to be UB.

Can you provide an example of currently specified behaviour that should be UB?

To be very clear I am using specification language here. "Unspecified behaviour" is very much not "undefined behaviour".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RFC: C++ Buffer Hardening by flohofwoe on Thursday October 06, 2022 @04:35AM (#33105956)
It's an LoTR joke: "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement"
[ Parent | on HN ]