Re:Imagen Video: high definition video generation with diffu...
by visarga on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @03:45PM
(#33100401)
> repackaging and reselling their work.
It's not their work unless it's identical, but in practice generated images are substantially different. Drawing in the style of is not copying, it's creative and it also depends on the "dialogue" with the prompter to get to the right image. The artist names added to the prompts act more like landmarks in the latent space, they are a useful shortcut to specifying the style.
If you look at the data itself it's ridiculous - the dataset is 2.3 billion images and the model 4.6 GB, that means it keeps a 2 byte summary from each work it "copies".
Re:Imagen Video: high definition video generation with diffu...
by shakingmyhead on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @05:08PM
(#33101262)
It’s not your work unless it’s identical is not how existing copyright law works so not sure why it would be how these things should be treated. Not to mention that moving around copies of the dataset itself is itself making copies that ARE identical…
Re:Imagen Video: high definition video generation with diffu...
by nearbuy on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @06:01PM
(#33101739)
DALL-E image of Mickey Mouse: https://openart.ai/discovery/generation-arxwmypmw7v5zpxeik1y...
This forced ideological posturing of 'if we give it to the plebes, they are going to generate something naughty with it' masks the somehow more cynically evil take of big tech, who are essentially taking the entire creative output of humanity and reselling it as their own, piecemeal.
Additionally I think the Dalle vs. Stable Diffusion comparison highlights the true masters of these people (or at least the ones they dare not cross) - corporations with powerful IP lawyers. Just ask Dalle to generate a picture with Mickey Mouse - it won't be able to do it.