Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by Jabrov on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @01:44PM
(#33098791)
This statement makes no sense. Ending the drug war will not automatically end the existence of cartels.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by stickfigure on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @02:04PM
(#33099028)
It just takes away 90% of their revenue, which is effective enough.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by uup on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @02:26PM
(#33099341)
The issue is that the cartels are now endemic to the region. They're part of the government, they're extorting legal businesses, they're laundering the money and investing into legitimate businesses. You can't just undo their influence.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by stickfigure on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @07:04PM
(#33102323)
You can still take away 90% of their revenue. There is no credible solution that does not begin with that step.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by uup on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @07:53PM
(#33102701)
How does ending the drug war take away 90% of their revenue. If you legalize drugs, the cartels would become legitimate producers and corner the market through fear and intimidation.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by stickfigure on Thursday October 06, 2022 @12:09PM
(#33110076)
#1 The price will drop to the floor.
#2 Most drugs can just as easily be produced domestically by pharmaceutical companies.
#3 Of the drugs that can't be produced domestically, the Mexican cartels are just middlemen that can be cut out entirely. There's no reason drugs from Colombia need to transit Mexico.
#4 If you're worried about Colombian cartels - see points #1 and #2.
We already went through this with alcohol and organized crime.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by didibus on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @02:43PM
(#33099600)
I think logically the path for these is to become legal business entities no?
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by CamperBob2 on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @08:09PM
(#33102805)
It worked with alcohol, why not with other drugs?
You don't see a lot of illegal speakeasies and moonshine stills around, do you?
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by soulofmischief on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @02:05PM
(#33099034)
So.... you're saying we shouldn't end the drug war? Because without a doubt that would have a massive impact on cartels.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by concordDance on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @02:31PM
(#33099428)
> So.... you're saying we shouldn't end the drug war?
You might want to reread his post or take reading comprehension lessons.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by soulofmischief on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @07:43PM
(#33102635)
No, I comprehend just fine. Parent poster is making a completely unnecessary comment in order to play devil's advocate, when we all know universally that ending the drug war is an important step in the conflict against an organized crime unit which came to prominence because of said drug war.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by Jabrov on Sunday October 09, 2022 @02:18AM
(#33138669)
I think you are actually not comprehending. I never said we shouldn’t end the drug war.
Re:Apple asks suppliers to shift AirPods, Beats production t...
by soulofmischief on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @12:17AM
(#33159461)
The original statement was derisive without actually offering any useful criticism, and I called it out by taking it to its logical conclusion. If you want more thoughtful replies, it starts with your own comment.