News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by LtWorf on Sunday October 02, 2022 @04:01AM (#33053916)
> A maintainer takes up explicit and implicit responsibilities to their users.

No, that's not how it works.

I'm free to publish something and completely ignore bugreports.

There is no such responsibility principle. Some people, out of goodness of their hearths, follow up on things. But they have no obligation to do so.

Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by praptak on Sunday October 02, 2022 @04:59AM (#33054222)
This is not about obligation to fix bug reports. It is about respectful communication, which is pretty orthogonal.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by fellellor on Sunday October 02, 2022 @05:50AM (#33054496)
I can just ghost you. The only obligatory relationship possible between us is either of blood or money. As a private individual, I don’t really owe you anything. You have the previlege of not having to use my work, or fork it and make it your own.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by praptak on Sunday October 02, 2022 @03:09PM (#33059160)
The only truly obligatory relationship is between you and the physical world. It's dictated by the laws of physics.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by epse on Sunday October 02, 2022 @07:39AM (#33055050)
You can and that's fine, but if you do reply and you're unnecessarily rude, I hope we can agree that's bad
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by LtWorf on Sunday October 02, 2022 @07:52AM (#33055108)
> I hope we can agree that's bad

No we can't agree on that. There is no obligation to be polite.

Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by biorach on Sunday October 02, 2022 @09:21AM (#33055657)
Rudeness is highly corrosive in a collaborative environment, RMS is damaging the community needed to sustain development by his rudeness.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by LtWorf on Sunday October 02, 2022 @09:39AM (#33055780)
There is no obligation to collaborate either. I can write a software, publish it and insult people who wrongly report bugs.

Of course I wouldn't expect people to love me for that, and it's not how I personally act; but if someone felt like acting in this way, it would be fully within his/her rights to do so.

Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by biorach on Sunday October 02, 2022 @09:55AM (#33055878)
RMS has the right to behave as he wants. He is not obliged to behave in a particular way.

My point is that the way he chooses to behave is in the long run damaging to the community that he founded and leads.

Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by LtWorf on Sunday October 02, 2022 @10:40AM (#33056230)
I replied to a comment saying "a maintainer". If you had unilaterally decided to change topic without informing me… well in the future try not to do that.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by biorach on Sunday October 02, 2022 @12:45PM (#33057636)
Not a change of topic. Rudeness from a maintainer is equally corrosive.
Re:An elegy for GNU and RMS by LtWorf on Monday October 03, 2022 @01:07AM (#33063655)
No it's not "corrosive".

You are somehow deciding that collaboration is needed and wanted by every maintainer.

That's your (wrong) assumption.