News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Hacking Google. Parent comment

Re:Hacking Google by hulitu on Saturday October 01, 2022 @02:06AM (#33044312)
> but the person who's making sure that malicious 3rd parties can't read the GMail accounts of journalists

But the friendly 3rd party has no issue reading the GMail accounts of journalists. Remember the "Doctor" incident some months ago ?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hacking Google by staticassertion on Saturday October 01, 2022 @02:52AM (#33044542)
No, I don't know what you are referring to.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hacking Google by hulitu on Saturday October 01, 2022 @03:32AM (#33044761)
When dad got arrested because he sent pictures of his child to the doctor.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hacking Google by staticassertion on Saturday October 01, 2022 @04:18AM (#33044962)
Not trying to be an asshole but can you just provide a source and try to make a clear point? Otherwise this conversation is like pulling teeth.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hacking Google by cookie_monsta on Saturday October 01, 2022 @09:37PM (#33051903)
I'm guessing the story was this: https://archive.ph/78Pla

and the point is that it's cold comfort getting protected from MITM when the person protecting you openly acts as a MITM

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Hacking Google by staticassertion on Sunday October 02, 2022 @08:08AM (#33055203)
Yes, this is just how CSAM detection works.
[ Parent | on HN ]