News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Co-Founding Considered Harmful by onion2k on Saturday October 01, 2022 @02:04AM (#33044305)
Maybe this is exclusively a networking or proximity problem but considering the tech circles I run in internationally, there just isn't an abundant amount of people I want to do business with as partners. And frankly, yes, it is because most people are woefully underqualified.

I think this is the attitude tech accelerators are actively trying to avoid when they look for startups with more than one founder. The most important thing by far in a startup is the ability of the founders to work with other people - to be successful in an accelwrator you'll need to work with the accelerator team, other founders, investors, people you hire, and your customers. Having a co-founder or two is a strong signal that you can do that. You will have no control whatsoever over who most of those people are, or how "qualified" they might be. You have to have the ability to get on well with them and work with them no matter what.

That doesn't mean you can't be a solo founder and succeed. People do that. It just means you're much less likely to succeed in an accelerator if you can't demonstrate the ability to work well with others.

Re:Co-Founding Considered Harmful by andrewmcwatters on Saturday October 01, 2022 @02:09AM (#33044330)
That does not seem to be why Y Combinator prefers cofounders.
Re:Co-Founding Considered Harmful by actionfromafar on Saturday October 01, 2022 @03:03AM (#33044614)
Y then?
Re:Co-Founding Considered Harmful by yourcousinbilly on Saturday October 01, 2022 @03:44AM (#33044805)
Two people to do the work. A founding team that can build and sell the product alone is the ideal team. All those skills in one person are hard enough to find. But the time required to sell and market is a full time job one cofounder often dedicates themselves to