Re:What to Do If a Nuclear Disaster Is Imminent
by rhinoceraptor on Thursday September 29, 2022 @02:34AM
(#33017185)
I personally have fasted for 28 days. The dangerous part isn't micronutrients, it's electrolytes. Fasting for an extended period can put you at a dangerously low level of certain electrolytes like phosphorus, which upon refeeding, are taken into the cells, which results in levels low enough to cause death. This is why extended fasting regimens should only be done with medical supervision.
Also, the initial onset of ketogenesis from fasting is very rough for people who aren't used to it. Most people's bodies are not used to it, and they won't be able to think clearly, they won't have much energy, etc.
Re:What to Do If a Nuclear Disaster Is Imminent
by jlawson on Thursday September 29, 2022 @01:12PM
(#33023887)
I believe the definition of micronutrient covers electrolytes (including phosphorus), but I see what you're saying. There would definitely be challenges!
I wonder suspect this would be alleviated if survivors managed to get like 300 calories a day of various foods, which seems more likely than pure starvation.
It turns out that all that fat really is like a giant extra-length fuel tank.
And many, many Americans have enough fat on them to break 3 months without eating a calorie. It might, in a bizarre way, save some of them.
(Micronutrients might be a problem but is much easier to solve than the calorie problem.)