News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by blacksmith_tb on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @01:27PM (#33010627)
Well, the problem there is that simply being homeless isn't a crime (which I will say seems to me to be reasonable - the alternative is things like the Victorian Poorhouses). Throwing trash all over the place (since there are no public trash services to speak of in most cities, and homeless people don't have service from trash haulers) is a crime, but if they were issued citations, they couldn't pay, and still don't have any way to get rid of their trash... I would think that using public money to haul away trash would have a pretty good return on investment for everyone concerned.
Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by maerF0x0 on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @01:36PM (#33010740)
> but if they were issued citations, they couldn't pay, and still don't have any way to get rid of their trash... I would think that using public money to haul away trash would have a pretty good return on investment for everyone concerned.

One of the points of the justice system is to ensure that people are sufficiently disincentivized from doing things that society has decided shouldnt be done. We shouldnt consider it a good investment to enable bad behavior.

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by runarberg on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @02:17PM (#33011296)
If that is the point of the justice system, then we really need to reconsider in light of how actual humans behave.

It has been shown multiple time over in experimental settings that punishment is a pretty poor means of modifying behavior. The deterrence of punishment is marginal at best. For punishment to work consistently you need to apply it consistently and immediately, law enforcement does neither.

There are other means of modifying behavior that are both scientifically proven and have shown results in the real world. This includes accommodating the desired behavior while disincentivizing the undesired ones.

If you want the unhoused to leave their surroundings cleaner, give them trash cans, public kitchens, safe use shelters, regular street cleaners, etc. If you don’t want them to pitch a tent on 17th and Mission, designate an area where they can.

No the point of the justice system is to give victims of crimes some solace that justice has been served. It has nothing to with the behavior of criminals.

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by maerF0x0 on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @02:31PM (#33011490)
> It has been shown multiple time over in experimental settings that punishment is a pretty poor means of modifying behavior. The deterrence of punishment is marginal at best. For punishment to work consistently you need to apply it consistently and immediately, law enforcement does neither

That's much more reasonable of a point than other peer comments. To which I mostly would suggest that rehabilitation is definitely an important part (and I'd agree with you if you claimed the USA is bad at rehabilitation... but lets improve that than bandaid something else)

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by nerb on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @01:56PM (#33010998)
that "[point] of the justice system" only works if you consider everyone in a vacuum and have the false notion everyone has equal access to resources. parent already outlined why people living on the street don't have the means to throw away trash in the right place, but you're focused on it "enabl[ing] bad behavior" and (i assume) in support of giving people that have no money fines (which also unfairly impact poorer people, but i'm sure that's lost on you as well). we have immense resources to provide public utilities like roads, why can't there be more public garbage cans (which benefit everyone; last time i visited SF it was a pain carrying trash everywhere)
Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by maerF0x0 on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @02:30PM (#33011465)
> eryone has equal access to resources

No false notions required -- all living people have a risk of loss of freedoms, which is why prison works.

> why can't there be more public garbage cans

I suppose this mostly makes sense until we start to have local businesses using them for free trash disposal. Why would I be more in favor of public trash cans you ask? (so you dont have to continue presuming...) Because it's enabling and encouraging an ideal behavior -- people dispose of their trash in an orderly manner.

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by nerb on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @02:42PM (#33011619)
> all living people have a risk of loss of freedoms

you realize that the justice system doesn't equally impact everyone, right? people with more wealth, more access are demonstrably treated better and have better outcomes with regard to the justice system, so no, all living people do not have the same risk of losing freedoms.

> ... which is why prison works

ah, there it is

i'm glad you agree with more access to public trash cans; however, i think it should be called out

> local businesses using them for free trash disposal

is already done in homeless encampments. i can find some, but there are many reports of businesses dumping in encampments because there's little risk of getting caught and no one bats an eye at trash-ridden encampments.

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by maerF0x0 on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @03:10PM (#33011932)
> everyone, right? people with more wealth, more access are demonstrably treated

I agree with you that this is an injustice and should be fixed, that doesnt mean we shouldnt work towards using the tool (it's not a either/or scenario, we can do both) .

> is already done in homeless encampments. ...

Only furthers my point as to why we should not be enabling bad behaviors

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by runarberg on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @07:52PM (#33014672)
> I agree with you that this is an injustice and should be fixed, that doesnt mean we shouldnt work towards using the tool (it's not a either/or scenario, we can do both) .

idk. the amount the police harasses the unhoused, I think we all would be living in a police state if the same brutality was employed equally across citizens.

Re:S.F. sued over homeless camp sweeps: city charged with cr... by runarberg on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @02:40PM (#33011600)
> I suppose this mostly makes sense until we start to have local businesses using them for free trash disposal.

If you really cared about this, then you would simply impose a simple tax on local businesses and give them garbage service in return. Or you’d enforce proper garbage disposal on the businesses not the unhoused. It is a lot easier to monitor and enforce the garbage disposal of businesses then that of the unhoused.