but it's a theory as of now and hence a "conspiracy theory". I'd like to mention that for me "conspiracy theory" is not a term I frown upon. It's been labelled as something equivalent to "dangerous tin foil hat bullshit" by some politicians and news outlets who'd like us to believe that history unfolds linearly and obviously.

"For me the word doesn't mean what everyone else thinks it means"

nice try, buddy ;)

Could we please have at least a shred of evidence of sabotage before we move on to the phase where we conclude there was sabotage? Sorry to be a stickler about major geopolitical crises.

There are 3 separate but simultaneous "accidents" on the pipelines. Do you have a proposal which would explain that and not involve sabotage?

They could have been fitted with explosives before for some reason and it was triggered by accident.

Two pipelines bust at once on Nord 1 and 2?

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/27/nord-stream...