Re:Physicists rewrite a quantum rule that clashes with our u...
by danwills on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @07:09AM
(#32993786)
I'm not a physicist, but I read some of Reg Cahill's papers a long time ago when they got a mention in some science magazine. The video in a sibling comment is the same thing.
It's definitely a fringe physics, but my (perhaps old and faulty?) crackpot-meter hasn't gone off yet! (although regular physicists seem to dismiss it quite freely).
Reg's page doesn't seem to link to the old stuff any more like it used to:
I'm not a strong proponent of it or anything but I just liked the overall philosophical replacement of objects with change/relation as the core thing and also especially the idea that space itself could have self-organized out of something more primordial (ie less structured/dimensional).
It's definitely a fringe physics, but my (perhaps old and faulty?) crackpot-meter hasn't gone off yet! (although regular physicists seem to dismiss it quite freely).
Reg's page doesn't seem to link to the old stuff any more like it used to:
https://www.flinders.edu.au/people/reg.cahill
I'm not a strong proponent of it or anything but I just liked the overall philosophical replacement of objects with change/relation as the core thing and also especially the idea that space itself could have self-organized out of something more primordial (ie less structured/dimensional).