Re:Outdated vs. Complete: In defense of apps that don’t need...
by mvdwoord on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @07:11AM
(#32993800)
First thing I was taught when I was introduced to a CL codebase/project..
"Library/repository activity has little to do with usability, or quality. Some things are more or less finished and correct."
Re:Outdated vs. Complete: In defense of apps that don’t need...
by simfree on Monday September 26, 2022 @11:29PM
(#32991281)
If your using a non-github platform without mirroring the repository, your pretty SoL for getting those green squares of activity to reflect your actual activity.
Re:Outdated vs. Complete: In defense of apps that don’t need...
by ungamedplayer on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @02:56AM
(#32992244)
Is that really a measure of activity, because i'm 90% sure i saw tools to fake that into some kind of image.
Edit: https://github.com/blaise-io/contribution
For example.. I guess that maybe gaming the system really is required if thats a 'good measure'.
Re:Outdated vs. Complete: In defense of apps that don’t need...
by themoonisachees on Wednesday September 28, 2022 @08:12AM
(#33006992)
Why should i care about the green squares (which can be faked anyway)? This feels like microsoft propaganda to get me to put everything on github for no good reason, especially considering that if he's pushing to a company git that company probably doesn't want it on the public internet.
Re:Outdated vs. Complete: In defense of apps that don’t need...
by samarthr1 on Monday September 26, 2022 @11:46PM
(#32991370)
SoL?
I imagine that I am not the only one.