Go runtime: 4 years later

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by vlunkr on Monday September 26, 2022 @06:59PM (#32989716)

> I do wonder how many people who understand Go's limitations (and work around them as you point out above) have truly given Rust a try (takes a few months - can't be done faster)

This is basically the "Anyone who doesn't love my favorite movie hasn't watched it enough times" argument. Programming language design is a complex space, there are no "correct" opinions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by swsieber on Monday September 26, 2022 @10:30PM (#32991003)

No, I don't thinkbit is that argument. I think the argument is "Rust has a really steep learning curve". Nor do they imply that everyone who has given Rust 3 months will like it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go runtime: 4 years later by baby on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @03:36AM (#32992497)

I tend to agree with his argument though, I can see how a lot of Golang developers would really benefit and enjoy migrating (I’m one of them) but I think it also depends on the type of applications that you usually write.

[ Parent | on HN ]