News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deployment and infrastructure for a bootstrapped webapp w... by xani_ on Monday September 26, 2022 @06:01PM (#32989127)
You're asking for net zero benefits at cost of adding hundreds of thousands of lines of code to your deployment path.

That really smells of desperate developer that need to feel relevant just because they use the latest thing

Like, how the fuck it would be "simpler" if the deploy is literally just running a single script ?

Re:Deployment and infrastructure for a bootstrapped webapp w... by endigma on Monday September 26, 2022 @06:08PM (#32989220)
I could fit an entire droneCI/fly deployment setup in a single HN comment, no idea what you've been scarred by.
Re:Deployment and infrastructure for a bootstrapped webapp w... by xani_ on Thursday September 29, 2022 @06:09AM (#33018484)
Calling include on someone's elses code is not programming nor ops no matter what lies you tell yourself.

And we use CI for 12 years and yes, our node definitions can also fit in your utterly idiotic metric

Want to tweet "our app is so small you can just npm get it" next ?

Re:Deployment and infrastructure for a bootstrapped webapp w... by RaitoBezarius on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @06:04AM (#32993417)
No you cannot fit their whole tree of dependencies, their semantics and their failures modes in a single HN comment.

People use basic tools because they have much more understandable semantics, everyone do not need a gigaton pile of Go code to deploy something.