News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Turns are better than radians by jacobolus on Monday September 26, 2022 @02:04PM (#32986221)
> Degrees are completely arbitrary

Degrees are very natural in the context of ancient astronomy/astrology, where you have (1) ~365 days in a year, so that if you look at the path of something that takes a year you get about one degree change per day but with a number that is more easily divisible. (2) approximately 4y, 10y, 8y, 15y, 12y, 30y cycles for the moon and various planets. (3) A calendar with 12 months, 12 zodiac signs. (4) A timekeeping system which breaks days into 24 hours and then uses divisions by sixty for smaller units. (4) A base-sixty number system – from ancient Mesopotamia, which persisted as the standard for astronomical calculations for millennia, only displaced in the very recent past.

Re:Turns are better than radians by sicariusnoctis on Monday September 26, 2022 @03:53PM (#32987506)
All those approximations have error and the behaviour you describe depends on where you are on Earth. Moreover, degrees are not natural from a mathematical perspective.
Re:Turns are better than radians by ararar on Monday September 26, 2022 @07:44PM (#32990088)
Out of curiosity, given a degree/calendar/time system could one localize the culture that created it?
Re:Turns are better than radians by jacobolus on Monday September 26, 2022 @09:47PM (#32990805)
You can tell that 'gradians' (and 'decimal time') were created by the base-ten-obsessed French revolutionaries who brought us the metric system.
Re:Turns are better than radians by lupire on Monday September 26, 2022 @05:42PM (#32988925)
That's... convenient for approximately our specific arbitrary position in the universe, but not mathematicallly natural.