Re:The Fed plans to sharply boost unemployment
by 0xbadc0de5 on Sunday September 25, 2022 @11:19AM
(#32972164)
Thank you for pointing this out. As much as I like to criticise the government (in many cases, well-deserved), it's important to keep a nuanced perspective and reserve criticism for cases that indeed warrant it. Not basing long term contracts on short term economic fluctuations seems like a reasonable policy.
If you're going to account for inflation in a contract, I believe indexing is the preferred method anyway. Many government pensions - and some salaries - are indexed to inflation.
Re:The Fed plans to sharply boost unemployment
by soulofmischief on Sunday September 25, 2022 @11:42AM
(#32972412)
Since wage hikes historically have not matched inflation, I don't see anything wrong with hikes that surpass inflation rates.
We have a lot of catching up to do, and incumbents designed this system so that healing the gap hurts the bottom line of voters, so there is simply no painless way out of it. We've all been paying towards a debt that is about to be realized.
Re:The Fed plans to sharply boost unemployment
by refurb on Sunday September 25, 2022 @10:49PM
(#32978786)
Not sure that's much better? Tiff also said "inflation is transitory", but hey, here we are.
And if I'm a union guy negotiating my next 3 year contract and I listen to Tiff and only get 8% this year, then 3% the next two years, is Tiff going to pay the difference when inflation isn't under control?
> “Don’t build that into longer term contracts. Don’t build that into wage contracts. It is going to take some time, but you can be confident that inflation will come down.”