> No, not at all. The web was specifically designed so that the client chooses which parts of the available content to load, and in what way.

It was designed with this technical capability. But the social contract was always that you went to a site for it to tell you what to display. And we have many very nice, very non-standard sites because of it.

There is nothing wrong on blocking part of that content, but everybody's state of mind is that by default, any site content is expected to load.