News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Using GPT-3 to pathfind in random graphs. Parent comment

Re:Using GPT-3 to pathfind in random graphs by pyinstallwoes on Saturday September 24, 2022 @06:15AM (#32961214)
Your example implies that they are not affected by star signs. This is arguably false given people believe in star signs and thus certainly influenced by the traits of said star signs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Using GPT-3 to pathfind in random graphs by mjburgess on Saturday September 24, 2022 @06:39AM (#32961308)
My point is a few instances of reality confirming our prejudices is not the basis for explanation. This is something we've already discovered, it's called "the scientific method", and its wholey absent from ML.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Using GPT-3 to pathfind in random graphs by YorkshireSeason on Saturday September 24, 2022 @07:00AM (#32961408)
How do you explain the tangible progress in ML?
[ Parent | on HN ]