News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TimescaleDB 2.7 vs. PostgreSQL 14 by akulkarni on Thursday September 22, 2022 @03:29PM (#32943567)
(Timescale co-founder)

That's a fair question.

We find that most developers storing time-series data on Postgres are doing so without pg_partman. So we first wanted to provide a benchmark that would be useful to most developers.

This benchmark was also the result of months of dedicated work. So the team did spend a lot of time on this. Unfortunately, they ran out of time to cover pg_partman. But that comparison is on our list of things to do soon.

Thanks!

Re:TimescaleDB 2.7 vs. PostgreSQL 14 by avar on Thursday September 22, 2022 @04:13PM (#32944026)
Most people storing time-series are also doing that outside of TimescaleDB.

So the relevant question isn't what a typical PostgreSQL user is doing, but whether someone wanting to optimize their storage should look at a PostgreSQL extension, or an upstart database like TimescaleDB.

Re:TimescaleDB 2.7 vs. PostgreSQL 14 by djk447 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @04:24PM (#32944168)
NB: I work at Timescale.

TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension, just to be clear.