Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by pyuser583 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @05:49PM
(#32945057)
Why stop there? Why not Fr. Coughlin or William Jennings Bryan?
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by ch4s3 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:00PM
(#32945187)
Why stop there Girolamo Savonarola was doing it in the 15th century, or Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus.
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by dr_dshiv on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:15PM
(#32945328)
> Savonarola
Love that the Catholic Church burned him at the stake for being too conservative. Really! Go Renaissance Popery!!
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by ch4s3 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:26PM
(#32945435)
Well, heresy and schism officially. But he was more of a populist than conservative and also weirdly sided with the invading French king which kind of pissed off the pope.
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by Tainnor on Friday September 23, 2022 @03:18AM
(#32948937)
How do the Gracchi fit in here? They were certainly populist, but decidedly not socially conservative.
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by ch4s3 on Saturday September 24, 2022 @01:57PM
(#32965063)
The comparison is that they're all fire breathing populists that stoked resentment, dabbled in conspiracy theories, and encouraged violence. My point is that these figures have always existed and aren't confined to the contemporary left/right binary. There's just something about people that makes these figures inevitable.
Re:Facebook proven to negatively impact mental health
by Tainnor on Tuesday September 27, 2022 @08:18AM
(#32994406)
I mean the Gracchi were undoubtedly populist, and were interested in their own benefit most of all but it's not like the resentment against a corrupt oligarchy that deprived most citizens of land came from nothing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society