News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by mempko on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @07:56PM (#32933204)
What are your thoughts on the generally slower launch times with a huge variance on GCP?
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by Crash0v3rid3 on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @08:16PM (#32933339)
The author failed to mention which regions these tests were run. GPU availability can vary depending on the regions that were tested for both Cloud providers.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by ayewo on Thursday September 22, 2022 @07:02AM (#32937236)
The author linked to the code at the end of the post.

The regions used are "us-east-1" for AWS [1] and "us-central1-b" for GCP [2].

1: https://github.com/piercefreeman/cloud-gpu-reliability/blob/...

2: https://github.com/piercefreeman/cloud-gpu-reliability/blob/...

Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by fomine3 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @02:42AM (#32935499)
This is a big missed point.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by jhugo on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @10:43PM (#32934270)
At work we run some (non-GPU) instances in every AWS region, and there's pretty big variability over time and region for on-demand launch time. I'd expect it might be even higher for GPU instances. I suspect that a more rigorous investigation might find there isn't quite as big a difference overall as this article suggests.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by valleyjo on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @10:21PM (#32934148)
Just remember this is for GPU instances. Other vm families are pretty fast to launch.
Re:AWS vs. GCP reliability is wildly different by kevincox on Thursday September 22, 2022 @10:12AM (#32939008)
FWIW in our use case of non-GPU instances they launched way faster and more consistently on GCP than AWS. So I guess it is complicated and may depend on exactly what instance you are launching.