News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tether ordered to produce documents showing backing of US... by jcranmer on Wednesday September 21, 2022 @03:02PM (#32929854)
> For the posterity of this thread American banks are no longer required to hold any reserve requirements at all[1].

That is misleading. Banks are no longer required to hold a certain fraction of their deposits in their bank account at a Federal Reserve bank--that's the reserve requirement that was reduced to 0%. Keep in mind that only money in the bank account qualifies as reserves that requirement; a literal pile of dollar bills would contribute not one cent.

Instead, banks are required to keep on hand sufficient equity for a percentage of their risk-weighted assets--money that, if the assets go to 0, can be raided to make up the losses. The requirement here starts at I believe 8%, and increases if you're a more important bank.

(If I'm computing it correctly, Tether has disclosed a capital ratio of approximately 0%, FWIW. Were Tether actually held to the same standards as a bank, Tether would be considered dangerously undercapitalized if not outright insolvent.)

Re:Tether ordered to produce documents showing backing of US... by Grimburger on Friday September 23, 2022 @09:41AM (#32951837)
> are required to keep on hand sufficient equity for a percentage of their risk-weighted assets

Define "sufficient", give it an actual number...

> Tether has disclosed a capital ratio of approximately 0%

NYAG accounted for 90% of their assets with that big case last year didn't they?

Re:Tether ordered to produce documents showing backing of US... by tptacek on Saturday September 24, 2022 @11:42AM (#32963734)
You didn't say "banks are no longer required to keep sufficient reserves". You said they were no longer required to keep reserves at all.