Re:Twilio CEO announces 11% in 'Anti-Racist' focused layoffs
by JosephGuerra on Monday September 19, 2022 @08:29AM
(#32897424)
All things being equal, they should just use a lottery system. But that's only if all things are equal. first and foremost should be job performance / salary weighed against necessity of people in a given position.
Trying to force a social context in a business scenario is asking for trouble, IMHO.
Re:Twilio CEO announces 11% in 'Anti-Racist' focused layoffs
by micromacrofoot on Monday September 19, 2022 @09:25AM
(#32897989)
Right, things are already not equal which is why last hire and lotteries don't work.
People also say that this is grounds for a lawsuit, but I think it will heavily depend on methodology. If they said "well you won't be laid off because you're asian" that's one thing... but if they said "layoffs traditionally favor white people, so we're going to anonymize our selection to avoid bias" then that's an entirely different story.
> Lawson did not provide any details about how the company would ensure that the layoffs did not cut deeper into certain groups of its 7,800 worldwide employees. But the move appears to be one of the first high-profile cases of a major tech company taking into consideration — at least publicly — the ways that job cuts might disproportionally affect certain workers.
> According to a study of 800 companies conducted by the American Sociological Review in 2014, companies that conducted “neutral” layoffs erased most or all of the progress they had made in diversity. Companies that relied on a “last hired, first fired” approach to layoffs for example, lost nearly 19% of their share of white women in management and 14% of their share of Asian men, according to report which was published in the Harvard Business Review.