News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The $300B Google-Meta advertising duopoly is under attack by bee_rider on Sunday September 18, 2022 @11:36PM (#32894007)
I thought I was basically immune to ads. Well, other than the "customers were also interested in" ones on Amazon that come up specifically when I'm already looking for a particular type of product. That of course has the opportunity to be exceptionally well targeted.

But I did notice a couple I'd fallen for. I happened to see Harry's Razors and Tommy John underwear in a store. They are heavily advertised on podcasts -- go to the online shop, the host will say, put in the code, get it shipped blah blah, your face and/or balls will feel nice. Somehow as a result they'd gotten into a mental niche in my brain as "things that would otherwise require jumping through annoying hoops to get," so when I saw them in a store, I ended up grabbing them. Because getting them otherwise would have been annoying. Yes in retrospect I recognize how silly this thought process was.

The razors I've been using for a while. They are basically fine I think -- which is to say, you only really notice is a razor is really shitty, and they aren't, so I'll call that a win. Just got the underwear recently, no notes yet.

Re:The $300B Google-Meta advertising duopoly is under attack by torginus on Monday September 19, 2022 @02:24AM (#32894931)
That's a fair point - but please note that the ads that have influenced your behavior have nothing to do with online advertising.

I'd assume you bought those things because you lend a higher degree of credibility to the podcasters' recommendations than TV ads or side banners.

These ads have nothing to do with the high tech $300B AI and data driven ad industry mentioned in the post, there were sponsored segments on radio talk shows more than half a century ago.