Re:Rapid Green Energy Transition Will Likely Result in Trill...
by ncmncm on Sunday September 18, 2022 @06:16AM
(#32886161)
Panels are so cheap now that they pay even if you waste most of what they could have produced. A smallish battery that captures only some of the excess, and delivers it when you need it, suffices. Battery cost is still falling fast as new chemistries come online. Hydrogen synthesis and storage might displace batteries for domestic use, particularly if hydrogen-fueled cars succeed. (Advice: keep all that equipment outside!) If not, zinc/bromine battery tech looks strong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rapid Green Energy Transition Will Likely Result in Trill...
by Yoric on Sunday September 18, 2022 @12:44PM
(#32889008)
Are you tokey of monetary cost or the total amount of energy needed to actually build/deliver/install/maintain/dispose of these technologies?
If the former, you are clearly right.
If the latter, I'm not so sure (with current tech).
Re:Rapid Green Energy Transition Will Likely Result in Trill...
by ncmncm on Sunday September 18, 2022 @03:21PM
(#32890591)
Monetary cost, as already noted, reveals an exact upper bound on the amount of energy needed to build and deliver the goods: people doing those get no discount on their power bill. The price also includes labor, administrative and marketing costs, tariffs, taxes, and whatever profit was taken, less any public subsidy or loss-leader discount.