U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate online speech

Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o... by vel0city on Sunday September 18, 2022 @02:09AM (#32884878)

Your problem is, Facebook and Twitter are 100% an "interactive computer service", through and through. They're not common carriers in the slightest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o... by catiopatio on Sunday September 18, 2022 @03:01AM (#32885158)

Yes, I know. I literally just articulated, in the comment you're replying to:

(1) That the invented classification was a mistake, and should be rectified, and

(2) How that invented classification — and the privileges it granted — was made in trade for something we never received (and never should have asked for): criminalization of “obscene or indecent” material on the internet.

I'm not sure whose arguments you believe you're rebutting, but they're not mine.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o... by scarface74 on Sunday September 18, 2022 @05:38AM (#32885956)

So now you want a law that if you host any type of comment section on the internet that the government can force you to allow any type of comments? You really don’t have a problem with the government taking your rights away?

[ Parent | on HN ]