Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o...
by mr_toad on Saturday September 17, 2022 @10:07PM
(#32883679)
> This chapter
applies only to a user who:
(1) resides in this state;
(2) does business in this state; or
(3) shares or receives content on a social media
They forgot (4) can afford a lawyer.
This law will only benefit those with deep pockets.
Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o...
by everforward on Sunday September 18, 2022 @11:40AM
(#32888451)
Oh, there will be plenty of pro se complainants with barely-intelligible filings. I would almost put money down that there will be a comical period where Texas' civil court is DDoSed by people filing pro se complaints around this law.
Re:U.S. appeals court rejects big tech’s right to regulate o...
by raverbashing on Sunday September 18, 2022 @02:26AM
(#32884955)
I'm sure nobody will fill their address as Texas and use a VPN (you might even not need both ways)
For some definitions of low cost-of-living, sure. In this law specifically:
There are, of course, plenty of low-cost-of-living "users" in Texas.