Added a context link. Here it is for you

https://www.wsj.com/articles/anticompetitive-woke-law-school...

That’s an opinion piece like a blogpost

Does it make it not true. Feel free to argue against it. Newspapers like New York times and WSJ require their opinion letters cite facts for statements they make. If the ABA is pushing woke curriculum on law schools, is that not the ABA being leftist with their policies?

I'll save you some trouble, the ABA replied here: https://www.wsj.com/articles/american-bar-association-aba-la...

The "do your own research" meme works better when the initiator can make the target go refer to a corpus of questionable content (that is often already ideologically skewed), actively filter out whatever they find benign, and zero in on whatever lights up their confirmation bias.

It seems like you're trying to turn someone's objection to a weak argument into a weak argument itself by referring to it as an example of a "meme". I'm not sure I need to say anything else to be honest.

Sitting mighty high in the saddle for someone who didn't bother addressing anything I actually said.

Edit: also unclear whether you realize I'm agreeing with the comment I responded to or not. /shrug