News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by hedora on Saturday September 17, 2022 @12:15PM (#32878680)
> Burn wood that is sourced somewhat locally (for me, typically 1-2 km, but I think even hundreds of km would make sense)

This is unlikely to matter much for carbon (modern ocean shipping is ridiculousy efficient, assuming the goods have a long shelf life). However, you need to do this to avoid spreading tree diseases and invasive insects.

> Burn the wood quickly at a high temperature to minimize particle emissions. This is quite effective.

For about $2000 you can get a 80% efficient wood stove with minimal emissions. It will have a catalytic, and can cleanly burn wood extremely slowly. It takes me about 36-48 hours to really get ours going in an efficient smoke free way. (It dumps smoke at startup, then you need to establish a solid coal bed.)

These are mandated by California, at least. Example model:

https://www.woodstovesguide.com/blaze-king-wood-stove-pricin...

https://www.blazeking.com/products/wood-stoves/princess-clas...

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by marvin on Saturday September 17, 2022 @12:30PM (#32878793)
Scandinavians know a thing or two about burning wood efficiently. Can't speak for Sweden or Finland, but new wood stove installations in Norway are mandated to generally have complete combustion and be efficient in combustion and heat transfer.

There's lots of local manufacturers with a long history, e.g. Jøtul. Their stoves are generally >80% efficient. E.g. https://www.jotul.no/produkter/ved

Newly-constructed city apartments are generally heated by centrally installed air-to-air or water electric heat pump, but single family homes are usually built with a modern wood stove for flexibility, atmosphere and redundancy. Older homes and apartments also very commonly (>50%) have a wood-fired heat source, and government mandates ensure that they have practically always been upgraded to modern specs.

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by tpmx on Saturday September 17, 2022 @04:25PM (#32881242)
The corresponding Swedish company is called Contura, headquartered in Markaryd, Småland, Sweden. Half an hour from where IKEA was founded, btw.

https://www.contura.eu/ (yeah, I know, that tld...)

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by hedora on Saturday September 17, 2022 @04:44PM (#32881398)
Their Jøtul F 100 ECO.2 LL is almost identical to the Blaze King I linked. Different aesthetics, but same efficiency rating.
Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by tpmx on Saturday September 17, 2022 @04:19PM (#32881187)
> This is unlikely to matter much for carbon (modern ocean shipping is ridiculousy efficient, assuming the goods have a long shelf life).

Strong doubt on this one. "Modern" ocean shipping is really bad when it comes to emissions.

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by hedora on Saturday September 17, 2022 @04:41PM (#32881378)
https://timeforchange.org/co2-emissions-for-shipping-of-good...

Moving something via cargo ship emits 10-40g of co2 per km * ton. I'll assume 10, since fire wood would be extremely low priority.

Assume you buy a 20lb bundle of foreign wood from a store 10 miles away, and transport it in the back of a Prius. (This seems optimistic for a rural area where wood heating makes sense.)

The prius gets about 50 mpg. Round trip, it drives 20 miles, so it uses 0.4 gallons of gas, or 8 lbs of CO2, which is 3.6 kg.

The earth's circumference is 40,000KM. Assume the wood traveled 20,000KM by sea.

20 lbs is 0.01 ton. 10g is 0.01 kg. 0.01kg * 0.01 ton * 20,000km is 2kg of CO2 emissions.

Even ignoring the emissions from harvesting and shipping the wood from the forest to the packaging plant, seasoning (drying) it, and the last mile delivery for the store, the overseas shipping is only 33% of the emissions.

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by cinntaile on Saturday September 17, 2022 @08:23PM (#32883056)
> Even ignoring the emissions from harvesting and shipping the wood from the forest to the packaging plant

This should still be the biggest source of emissions. It's apparently his neighbor that gives him the wood, so I tried to find out some details regarding fuel use to quantify the emissions of his so called CO2 neutral wood but no dice.

Re:The absurdity of Europe burning wood for energy by tobinfekkes on Saturday September 17, 2022 @12:33PM (#32878819)
We recently converted our cabin in Alaska to a BlazeKing. Best decision ever! Absolute game changer.