Re:A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deploy...
by perihelions on Saturday September 17, 2022 @09:39AM
(#32877460)
Also, access to international sulfur markets.
That wouldn't be a barrier for Canada though, which has access to an unlimited supply from (ironically) its oil industry. Athabasca oil sands are somewhere around 5% sulfur, most of which gets extracted and piled up into useless pyramids (since no one is buying it).
https://www.businessinsider.com/there-are-mountains-of-sulfu...
https://boingboing.net/2016/07/05/the-great-sulphur-pyramids...
Re:A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deploy...
by mabbo on Saturday September 17, 2022 @11:52AM
(#32878486)
Perfect. At long last my country will take it's rightful place as ruler of the world: we'll start a massive global cooling project and threaten to end it in a termination shock if we aren't properly compensated for it.
Re:A subpolar-focused stratospheric aerosol injection deploy...
by Klaster_1 on Saturday September 17, 2022 @10:23AM
(#32877738)
Neil Stephenson explores this theme in Termination Shock [1], worth a read if you are curious about the subject.
It's a logistics problem, not a technology problem.
Just as there's no legal framework to force countries to not make the climate warmer, the same goes for cooling the climate.