Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by techdragon on Saturday September 17, 2022 @01:29AM
(#32875027)
Because the UFO angle brings free publicity. Everything I’ve read of his about this sort of thing is always couched in language that makes it clear he’s not convinced it’s definitely aliens, he just wants to push a boundary and found a useful untapped stream of free PR and the funding that can bring so he writes regularly plausible science up, but plays up the Alien angle to get crowd attention… in part because he got fed up with even the suggestion that something being aliens was ridiculous when a large percentage of scientists consider the chances were completely alone in the universe to be quite low.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by nullifidian on Saturday September 17, 2022 @09:10AM
(#32877251)
Just like how almost all planetary science projects are presented to the public as efforts to find life. This is just "manufacturing consent" messaging to ensure continued funding and public interest.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by Simon_O_Rourke on Saturday September 17, 2022 @02:53AM
(#32875362)
I get that, but it really irks my inner academic when he shifts gears this way.
"Maybe it's a meteorite, maybe it's an alien though... Or maybe it's Elvis flying on the Loch Ness monster."
The old quip that it's a small step from the sublime to the ridiculous applies here I think.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by fsloth on Saturday September 17, 2022 @05:22AM
(#32876065)
Hypothesizing about a billion year old alien remnant is not Loch Ness monster, it’s just discussing statistics about a phenomena we have no good statistics for - except we know it’s plausible since we already know interstellar space is already populated by two probes launched by a civilization of sentient creatures. I’d say its a topic solidly in the domain of scientific inquiry, but it’s not well defined yet since people trying to discuss it are labeled loonies (reminds me of atom theory and plate tectonics- two phenomena which were prominently ridiculed as well). Of course, ”alien studies” is a domain that is quite hard at the moment-and may always remain so.
And sure, there is lots of crazy talk around the topic. But the fact we have people trying to invent perpetual motion machines does not make every thermodynamicist and machine engineer looney.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by Simon_O_Rourke on Sunday September 18, 2022 @01:45AM
(#32884754)
> populated by two probes launched by a civilization of sentient creatures.
I've been to parts of New Jersey, and proving it's civilization, let alone sentience or any form of self-awareness may be eagerly disputable.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by adastra22 on Saturday September 17, 2022 @05:37AM
(#32876134)
This funding is from people interested in the ET angle. Aliens is how you get the money.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by cronix on Saturday September 17, 2022 @12:24PM
(#32878753)
Right, "a search for new life" will always trump "a search for new mineral" in the eyes of the public and likely most of the scientific community.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by colordrops on Saturday September 17, 2022 @04:08AM
(#32875685)
Have you listened to any of his other talks? Do you understand his reasoning as to why he mentions aliens? He addresses stereotypical attitudes identical to yours.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by Simon_O_Rourke on Sunday September 18, 2022 @05:04PM
(#32891488)
Yes I have and no he doesn't.
Re:Galileo Project now fully funded for expedition to study ...
by colordrops on Sunday September 18, 2022 @06:34PM
(#32892117)
Yes he does, pretty directly: