Re:The Koh-i-Noor diamond, and why the British won’t give it...
by glandium on Friday September 16, 2022 @02:17AM
(#32862715)
How far back should we go? Alexander the Great?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Koh-i-Noor diamond, and why the British won’t give it...
by osrec on Friday September 16, 2022 @02:57AM
(#32862972)
I guess then in your opinion what the Nazis did was fair game, and they should not have had to pay reparations either? What, in your opinion, is the cutoff point in time, where sins are universally absolved?
Edit: It's clearly a subjective topic, but there are significant impacts felt the world over due to the British empire. I'm not sure you can say the same of Alexander the Great. People are directly and significantly affected to this day by the actions of the British. I guess the nature and extent of the impact would need to be decided by a court, but it'll always be an imperfect science. That doesn't mean it's unnecessary.
Re:The Koh-i-Noor diamond, and why the British won’t give it...
by rayiner on Friday September 16, 2022 @07:06AM
(#32864543)
The nazis paid reparations in the lifetime of the people affected.
Re:The Koh-i-Noor diamond, and why the British won’t give it...
by ashwagary on Friday September 16, 2022 @10:43AM
(#32866678)
The US and British strategy is to wait out the plundered to avoid repayment. For this reason, Germans deserve a lot more respect. Reparations has been a serious topic of discussion since the late 1800s in the case of the American enslaved populations and it still hasn't been done.