Re:Senators introduce bill to thin out the 900k pieces of or...
by LorenPechtel on Thursday September 15, 2022 @11:20PM
(#32861683)
The tax wouldn't be small. I do agree, though, the only real answer is to charge for putting things in orbit and refund it to whoever deorbits the thing.
Re:Senators introduce bill to thin out the 900k pieces of or...
by structural on Thursday September 15, 2022 @11:52PM
(#32861850)
A fee per kilogram placed in orbit, refundable if the entire mass is deorbited as a single object, seems like a reasonable starting point.
If that fee is the entire estimated near-term cost to recover the object, it would also create incentives for entities putting large amounts of mass in orbit to focus on improved strategies for removal: if removal becomes lower cost than the fee, it's worth paying someone to recover your debris if a satellite fails in order to recover the fee.
Re:Senators introduce bill to thin out the 900k pieces of or...
by freeqaz on Friday September 16, 2022 @03:39AM
(#32863272)
This would have to work across borders or else you'd create a downward force on the space industry in your nation. If the US had a tax to launch stuff, then suddenly Russia has a competitive advantage.
Re:Senators introduce bill to thin out the 900k pieces of or...
by autoexec on Thursday September 15, 2022 @08:36PM
(#32860430)
> I can't find xboneslife's comment to reply to
I can't even find their account https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=xboneslife
Wonder what happened...
Re:Senators introduce bill to thin out the 900k pieces of or...
by klyrs on Thursday September 15, 2022 @09:06PM
(#32860693)
Even weirder, this discussion is Google's only relevant hit for "xboneslife."
> You can just put the same price on debris addition.
Indeed. A small tax that matches the cost of debris capture payment + minor administrative overhead would encourage the outcome that junk isn't thrown into unrecoverable orbit.