News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Head-On Crash: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air (2009) by Doxin on Thursday September 15, 2022 @03:03AM (#32848125)
I get why thin pillars don't work with modern safety standards, but surely tall windows are fine? There's plenty modern cars with fairly tall windows, like the renault kangoo?
Re:Head-On Crash: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air (2009) by DavidPeiffer on Thursday September 15, 2022 @08:43AM (#32850948)
I'm not having success finding the requirements, but I am almost certain there are requirements on window size. Purely by logic, as the window size increases, side impact rating will decrease.
Re:Head-On Crash: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air (2009) by blt on Thursday September 15, 2022 @08:40PM (#32860473)
It's not the tall windows themselves that are dangerous, it's the accompanying low door sills. Higher door sills mean more of your body is protected by metal instead of glass.
Re:Head-On Crash: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air (2009) by hef19898 on Thursday September 15, 2022 @05:52AM (#32849443)
You need both, slim pillars and large windows, to have the same aesthetic as classic cars.