Re:DuckDuckGo, Proton, Mozilla back bill targeting Big Tech ...
by skyyler on Wednesday September 14, 2022 @04:02PM
(#32842601)
A small minority already toils away in factories in the USA:
>In fiscal year 2021, the division found 2,819 minors employed in violation of the law and assessed employers with nearly $3.4 million in civil money penalties.
https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20220729
If it was legal it would be very widespread and you're lying to yourself if you say otherwise.
Re:DuckDuckGo, Proton, Mozilla back bill targeting Big Tech ...
by cabbagesauce on Wednesday September 14, 2022 @03:35PM
(#32842206)
Oh come on, let's just admit that USA is much more sex-obsessed than the rest of the world..
Re:DuckDuckGo, Proton, Mozilla back bill targeting Big Tech ...
by Crash0v3rid3 on Wednesday September 14, 2022 @03:50PM
(#32842440)
Do you have any data at all to back this up?
Re:DuckDuckGo, Proton, Mozilla back bill targeting Big Tech ...
by brnt on Thursday September 15, 2022 @02:52AM
(#32848051)
The whole world does not understand that some nudity and affection makes anything PG rated, but depiction of violence and weapons really has to get very visual before it gets that rating.
In todays litigious USA, children would come with too much liability to employ in many many settings. Children are quite capable of doing many different jobs. Total exclusion from the workplace delays the earnings, experience, learning, and networking of people.
Child labor laws have made exceptions for performers for some reason. I think most people would agree that this is fine. Why have we not made exceptions for other areas of work?
A less regulated child labor market would find those exceptions naturally.