News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gödel, Escher, Bach: an in-depth explainer by thayne on Wednesday September 14, 2022 @03:20AM (#32834218)
sure, but if you ignore any connection to the real world or platonic truth and are just talking about within the ZFC formalism, then `CH ∨ ¬CH` is a true statement, even though it is impossible to prove either `CH` or `¬CH`.
Re:Gödel, Escher, Bach: an in-depth explainer by chriswarbo on Wednesday September 14, 2022 @07:52AM (#32835872)
> within the ZFC formalism, then `CH ∨ ¬CH` is a true statement

It's also a provable statement (via excluded middle)