News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Stable Diffusion a big deal? by marc_io on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @12:05PM (#32826135)
The author uses the terms “designer” and “artist” interchangeably. These are not the same activities at all.
Re:Is Stable Diffusion a big deal? by jamiegreen on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @12:08PM (#32826178)
Hey, author here! That's a great point, sloppy there on my part that I failed to notice that.

Do you think they will be affected differently? (I have my own thoughts but curious to hear yours here)

Re:Is Stable Diffusion a big deal? by marc_io on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @12:57PM (#32826961)
> Do you think they will be affected differently?

I do. Design is more focused on practical problem-solving, so these AI tools are great for helping that, actually. I don't see this as a threat to these professionals at all. Yes, a design project can eventually be considered art, but this is a byproduct of the design process.

People that are invested in specific visual art roles – specially those involved in the creation of a single piece or artwork, like cover illustrators, painters, photographers, and the like – will probably be more challenged by that.

But even then, it's just too early to know the long term impacts. I think that the effects will be highly variable. I'm sure a lot of artists will thrive with these tools, using them as a springboard for their careers – or even participate in the creation of new roles and modalities in the art scene. We have to wait and see what happens.

Re:Is Stable Diffusion a big deal? by lancesells on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @03:01PM (#32828776)
Design - I can see there being a lot of help with iterative processes and things like typefaces and the grid. There will still be needs for designers. Maybe even more than ever.

Illlustrators - So much of the output that I see looks like illustration more than anything. Midjourney seems to love that digital / procreate illustration style. I think this area might suffer in the years to come once the details and strange artifacts start to go away.

Painters - Used for ideation. While I'm sure there are physical tools that can mimic some sort of painting on a surface I don't see it having much impact. A lot of painting is layers, push and pull, imperfections, brush strokes and a tactile surface.

Photographers - If you're a stock photographer you will probably suffer over time. Overall though I think talented photographers are very much going to continue to work. Open up a Vogue magazine and you'll see there's a gulf between what humans are creating and what these tools are outputting.

Others - If you do cheap (not neccessarily bad) work on Fiverr you'll soon be competing with these tools for work. I would be shocked if Fiverr itself isn't investing in these tools themselves.

Re:Is Stable Diffusion a big deal? by jamiegreen on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @01:20PM (#32827337)
Yes I tend to agree, especially to your point about the long term effects.

It is certainly an earthquake for visual artists!