News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why HTTP without encryption and self-signed sertificates are OK. Parent comment

Re:Why HTTP without encryption and self-signed sertificates ... by ryan-c on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @11:26AM (#32825546)
I believe the flow allows you to view certificate information prior to accepting, and then only that certificate will be accepted for only that hostname.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why HTTP without encryption and self-signed sertificates ... by tialaramex on Tuesday September 13, 2022 @08:14PM (#32831766)
Which browser do you think that's true for, and, have you tried it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why HTTP without encryption and self-signed sertificates ... by ryan-c on Friday September 16, 2022 @08:09PM (#32873581)
All desktop browsers I've tried. I don't have anything other than Chrome handy at the moment, but it definitely still works.

You just need to click on the "Not Secure" warning that's where the lock symbol would be, then on "Certificate is not valid".

[ Parent | on HN ]