Re:Startups: Silicon Valley vs. The Emerging World
by compman775 on Saturday November 26, 2011 @02:54PM
(#3280534)
Your example company would eventually be awesome to own. It's annual revenue after y years would be r(y) = 12 * 2000 * 2^y. After 10 years, the annual revenue would $24,576,000. After 20, $25,165,824,000. After 30 years, $25,769,803,776,000.
Re:Startups: Silicon Valley vs. The Emerging World
by kiba on Saturday November 26, 2011 @04:02PM
(#3280686)
After 30 years of growth, your company is the size of several countries, GDP-wise.
Assuming zero inflation in our monetary supply and thus zero price inflation, this is undoubtedly an unrealistic assumption.
So why don't the founders take money and use it to accelerate growth? Realistically, in most places that aren't Silicon Valley, this sort of business will have trouble raising any meaningful amount on halfway decent terms until years 3-4, at which point any sane founder will be loath to give up equity in exchange for cash.