Re:Ask HN: How did you start higher education after 40?
by Der_Einzige on Sunday September 11, 2022 @12:55PM
(#32801222)
If you get spooked by deontology in most philosophy classes, than maybe it's better to not take those philosophy classes in the first place.
This world needs more utilitarianism and less categorical imperatives...
Re:Ask HN: How did you start higher education after 40?
by capitalsigma on Sunday September 11, 2022 @01:09PM
(#32801348)
Kant is actually towards the top of my list of "stuff I thought was dumb before I read the actual source material but which I now have a lot of respect for." The categorical imperative stuff is a reflection of a really profound value that Kant assigns to human life.
Utilitarianism benefits a lot from having a Cliff notes version that sounds less dumb than the Cliff notes versions of other ethical frameworks, but I don't think that is the right way to evaluate ethics. Besides, philosophy class ethics is really more of an exercise in "let's construct a formal framework that matches our intuitions" rather than "let's make normative judgements about stuff in the real world."
On the other hand, something like:
> Given a one-dimensional invariant subspace, prove that any nonzero vector in that space is an eigenvector and all such eigenvectors have the same eigenvalue.
really forces you to grapple with an entirely different level of abstraction