As long as you participate in Hindu rituals and changing how you practice your own (breaking fast). This also sounds like as a non-Hindu you are declaring your ‘foreign’ faith as inferior to Hinduism.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh#St...
Here’s a review of the book - https://reddit.com/r/india/comments/qsdvhb/understanding_hin...
Savarkar was not the founder of the RSS. He ridiculed cow worship, ate beef and encouraged the consumption of meat and eggs. He did not exert any significant pull on the RSS and never got along with Golwalkar. I think it would be helpful if you read actual history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh.
Savarkar's ideas, especially that book (Hindutva), have always been influential. I strongly suggest reading the summary I linked. I agree that Savarkar wasn't religious, and it's fascinating how he managed to square that with his stance on Hindutva.
Here's another interesting thing - can you imagine a Marathi recommend that all Indians speak Hindi? Except that's exactly what he did.
> I think it would be helpful if you read actual history.
This is needlessly snarky. Please be better than this.
I don't have any sympathy for Sanghis but this isn't accurate. They have a majoritarian conception of nationalism but they don't envision a state where minorities do not exist. Hell, the RSS has a Muslim wing, the Muslim Rashtriya Manch.
The most despicable hate mongers like Adityanath and Sakshi Maharaj are not actually RSS members. The RSS is moderate in comparison. This is a function of the Overton Window has shifting to an extent but also because the RSS has mellowed.