News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jackson’s water crisis: latest updates by 5d8767c68926 on Saturday September 10, 2022 @08:42PM (#32795823)
Given the size of the armed forces, assigning some percentage to domestic infrastructure seems like a fantastically good idea.
Re:Jackson’s water crisis: latest updates by skissane on Saturday September 10, 2022 @10:06PM (#32796230)
It's a somewhat unusual arrangement though, to have a division of the armed forces perform essentially civilian functions, isn't it?

Maybe not globally – gendarmerie come to mind – but certainly in the English-speaking world?

Re:Jackson’s water crisis: latest updates by andirk on Saturday September 10, 2022 @11:20PM (#32796542)
The current US military budget (#1 highest globally) is fitting for a country who is currently at war with the next 5-10 highest military budget countries. And since theyre allies with most of those countries, and at war with none of them, and since both political parties' #1 marching order is to increase that budget, I for one would enjoy seeing that faction be used to aid domestic infrastructure.
Re:Jackson’s water crisis: latest updates by mellavora on Sunday September 11, 2022 @04:44AM (#32797925)
Unusual, but very sensible. Military is trained to operate in chaotic environments where basic facilities (transport, communications, supply, ...) cannot be counted on.

Seems perfect for response to natural disasters, which seem to be becoming more common these days.

The military is about much much more than fighting/killing.

Re:Jackson’s water crisis: latest updates by vkou on Sunday September 11, 2022 @12:55AM (#32796940)
It's an unusual arrangement, but it is absolutely something other countries should be adopting. Canada's equivalent thereof (as well as its equivalent to FEMA) was completely not up to the task when it came to last year's flooding in BC.