A large part of it is obviously that his projects really are good and plentiful but I think another sizeable part is due to something the article points out: he doesn't do any self promotion. He doesn't write blogposts, he doesn't do interviews, he doesn't have any hot takes on Twitter, he doesn't comment on HN... he just writes great code. It's both admirable/enviable as well as a bit more mysterious or "out of reach" than a lot of the other "legendary programmers" e.g. Justine who write equally amazing things but are a bit more tangible here. Not that one way is right or wrong it just helps his name get pretty consistently randomly brought up by HNers.
IMO, that is what makes him so unique and a bazillion times better than other so-called "greats". And he gives away all of his work for free. He lives by actual principles, morals and ethics which most of us only mouth.
What i really really would like to see is an in-depth interview with him on his Worldviews, Problem solving approach, How to focus on studying something, Productivity tips etc. I can't help but feel that he has a certain approach to life, studies and work (not just hard work) which if we could learn from would make us "better".
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
I don't know what triggered this particular (re)submission, but I found about his quickjs hours ago by reading a thread about javascript in youtube-dl that is a serious candidate ...
I’ve decided that’s the analogy I’ll be using for someone who’s really good at something
The third stage will be tomorrow when comments casually refer to information gleaned from the article submitted today as if it were common knowledge. There will be an article about a new JS framework and someone will make a comment like "of course, programmers like Bellard[0] managed to be quite productive without the use of a similar framework."
The circle of life is majestic to behold.