Re:CS 168: The Modern Algorithmic Toolbox
by hhmc on Saturday September 10, 2022 @09:08PM
(#32795958)
> Maybe you meant “poorly handled case”?
No, I meant adversarial. It's standard languge (jargon if you wish) from mathematical proofs.
Re:CS 168: The Modern Algorithmic Toolbox
by zamfi on Saturday September 10, 2022 @11:08PM
(#32796502)
Huh, interesting. In the ML and CS theory literature I’ve only ever seen “adversarial example” used to mean an input explicitly designed to produce a specific unexpected output, not just a worst-case output that isn’t what you want.
Do you have an example use of this sense that I could look at to update myself?
In any case, I’m not sure your example is actually adversarial, as there’s not an action that an adversary could take implied by it? Maybe you meant “poorly handled case”? But yes, run it iteratively. 10 steps? 20? Until convergence for some epsilon?
Nothing against theory, but I think they did fine without it.