It’s pretty cruel and brutal to me but it gets them what they want I guess.
The real question is, in a modern society, where freedom of speech exists, how disruptive should protests be allowed to be?
I don’t know the answer myself but I think some limits may be required.
Sure, that's cruel. Unlike Louis XVI, the sheep and cows were not the ones who were accountable for a deeply unfair status quo.
> The real question is, in a modern society, where freedom of speech exists, how disruptive should protests be allowed to be?
Freedom of speech alone does not guarantee fairness.
> I don’t know the answer myself but I think some limits may be required.
What are the guarantees that legislative or executive power over such limits does not get abused for profit or ideology?