By comparison here is a CEO announcing a noble "sacrifice" at 3 million/yr salary while people and projects were being axed at Mozilla - and in my view Mozilla continues to falter relative to what its trajectory could have been given the extreme amounts of capitol and talent they've had access to.
A real sacrifice would've been to take $0 (presumably this individual is already enormously wealthy).
You do realize in these organizations not everyone is making 150k+.
comment 1: How dare she say 3 million is a sacrifice? That's more money than many of us will see in an entire decade, if not more! None of us can get imagine getting 3 million!
comment 2: Well she could make 10 million, so 3 million to her is chump change.
My guess is as follows: The "us" in comment 1 is the poor, the failure to "read the room" is comment 2 mentioning the 10 million when the vast majority of people identify with comment 1 and thus think mentioning 10 million when even 3 million is unattainable is tone deaf.
Thus, loosely speaking, 10 million is cake, 3 million is bread.
But I agree with you that the analogy is not perfect.
> Yeah the poor could sustain themselves on cake,
This is the opposite of what the anecdote is meant to say, right? The joke is that the poor can't sustain themselves on cake because lacking bread also means lacking cake. Is $3 million the bread? Is the CEO the poor? Am I having a stroke?