Re:After a Legal Fight, Oberlin Says It Will Pay $36.59M to ...
by aqouta on Friday September 09, 2022 @05:25PM
(#32785110)
That's not really how insurance works. Everything gets paid for by someone, it's not magic money. A systemic increase in insurance payouts causes a proportional systemic increase in insurance premiums which are ultimately passed onto the customer.
One person is more culpable in the life ruining than the person who contacts the police.
Re:After a Legal Fight, Oberlin Says It Will Pay $36.59M to ...
by subsistence234 on Friday September 09, 2022 @08:34AM
(#32778353)
See the wikipedia article to learn what actually happened, the Oberlin statement and the NYT article are misleading:
An employee took a photo of the shoplifter in the act of stealing, the shoplifter got angry and assaulted the employee for this. That's when then the employee tried apprehending the shoplifter.
Assault, not petty theft. Also, doesn't violence turn theft into robbery?
Re:After a Legal Fight, Oberlin Says It Will Pay $36.59M to ...
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday September 09, 2022 @01:55PM
(#32782646)
Theft is a crime. It warrants the same response as an assault.
Re:After a Legal Fight, Oberlin Says It Will Pay $36.59M to ...
by Handytinge on Friday September 16, 2022 @09:25PM
(#32873981)
> Is it worth it to throw away a human life in that black whole over a bottle of wine?
Except that's not what happened. The shopkeeper was assaulted and another shopkeeper (a member of their family) also assaulted before they pursued the assailant.
In abstract both arguments (strict enforcement of all laws; and that the system's results are inhumane so lesser laws should be ignored) make surface level sense. A middle ground sounds best (some laws are loosened, leniency is used on first offenses, prison system reform to rehabilitate instead of punish, etc.).