Re:Pypi.org is running a survey on the state of Python packa...
by dagw on Thursday September 08, 2022 @09:39AM
(#32765358)
Just because the egg/wheel format existed, didn't mean that they where actually used and actually worked. Being able to reliable pip install packages like numpy and gdal only started 3-4 years ago. There is a reason that Christoph Gohlke's python package site exists and was popular.
Re:Pypi.org is running a survey on the state of Python packa...
by pletnes on Thursday September 08, 2022 @09:34AM
(#32765278)
I started using numpy around 2007 and didn’t see reliable binary installs with good numerical performance until I discovered anaconda, much later (2016?). Maybe I hung out with the wrong people, or libraries. Some libraries did not have compiled wheels a few years ago, and M1 macs still run into the very occasional issue.
Re:Pypi.org is running a survey on the state of Python packa...
by pletnes on Thursday September 08, 2022 @09:37AM
(#32765313)
9 out of the top 360 packages still do not offer wheels!
https://pythonwheels.com/
Re:Pypi.org is running a survey on the state of Python packa...
by BerislavLopac on Friday September 09, 2022 @04:30AM
(#32776799)
Not having a wheel is not really an issue for Python-only packages.
Give, quite a bit. The egg format was introduced in 2004 [0], and even the newer wheel, that replaced it, is turning 10 later this month.
[0] https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/discussions/wheel-vs-...